Linkedin and Twitter

View Philip Collard's profile on LinkedIn

Wednesday, 10 June 2015

2014 Bid Cost Survey Blog 3

Focusing our Investment in bids

We have looked at feedback on why bids have been won or lost and how bidding behaviours influence bid outcomes. The survey also shows that winning bidders invest more in their bids. However, losing bids still consume significant amounts of staff hours and other costs. 

Within the survey, participants were asked to break down their estimates of the total time their company spent in the different stages of work-winning activities. These hours were then converted to a value and added to other costs identified at each stage, giving a total cost for a bid.
As the survey results indicate that the median number of bidders is five (four losing bids plus one winning bid), the projects submitted to the survey may account for only one in five of the total number of bids entered, meaning the actual cost to all of the bidders who put in submissions will be significantly higher. 
From the survey results, it is not just the gross amount of time or money spent that result in winning bids. It is also important that this investment is focused on the activities identified as creating a winning bid.

Looking at the sample, differences in behaviours between those that won bids and those that lost bids are evident

Apart from strategy and PQQ, the winning contractors spent significantly more across the board than the losers, but especially on:
  • Decision to bid (double the time)
  • Selecting/briefing bid manager; strategy setting
  • Planning and pursuit; intelligence gathering; meetings to distil client objectives; relationship building
  • More time but less external inputs on identifying proposal requirements
  • editing boilerplate, and writing bespoke content and more external inputs
  • finalising CVs, case studies, graphic design and document production
  • internal reviews/governance; post bid evaluation; dissemination of lessons learnt
  • interview rehearsal; interview/negotiations
  • Slightly more time on identifying/ agreeing cost requirements, final review

Losing bidders spend more externally, possibly due to winning bidders investing in in-house resources, or possibly the former are more likely to put increased emphasis on “production qualities” than research and bespoke content, i.e. style over substance.

For consultants, the winning bidders spent more overall on:
  • Strategy
  • Intelligence gathering
  • PQQ (slightly)
  • Meetings to understand needs
  • Appointing bid team
  • Understanding proposal requirements

For consultants, the winning bidders spent less spend on:
  • Graphics, refining CVs and case studies
  • Interview
  • Shaping generic content, etc.
  • Internal reviews
  • Rehearsals + interviews
Several of the points mentioned in the narrative, like graphics, refining CVs, etc., are not seen in these numeric tables, due to the this level of detail being consolidated into broader groups to aid analysis

This data deals with headline results across a complex industry with a lot of variables and different behaviours may result in different outcomes for diverse project types. This supports the MarketingWorks approach to work winning:
  • It is important to understand your market and how your organisation's success is influenced by your approach:
  • Bidders need to understand the relative importance of early engagement vs presentation, for example, and use this information to prioritise their efforts, in their work winning planning, bid selection and bid management decisions.
  • In effect to budget the cost of winning.
  • The tremendous diversity of the industry means that it’s not as simple as to say everyone should put more effort into X or Y. However, we can say from this data that consultants who won invested more than those who lost and, significantly, contractors who won invested on average 25% more on their bids in this sample than those who lost.

The MarketingWorks programme Facilitating Improvement of Work Winning Processes, Behaviours and Cultures follows a very practical approach and has helped many clients to achieve significant improvements.  We break down the complete process of work winning into inter-connected stages and apply inclusive diagnostic approaches to identify opportunities for improvements in each stage that beneficially impact the process as a whole. Through involving the work winning teams, buy-in to new approaches is generated and once companies have immersed themselves in the MarketingWorks programme, they achieve impressive business improvements:

Example of improvements when using a weighted bid/ no bid selectivity tool and applying improved, client-centric work winning approaches and behaviours

A UK regional contractor has shared their own bid cost analysis that underpins the impact that focusing on bid selection and work winning behaviours and focus had on their 2013-2014 results vs 2012-2013 results. Win rates improved from 1:5 to 1:2. Bid costs were only captured towards the end of the 2012-13 period, but were captured throughout 2013-14.

To Participate Further

MarketingWorks helps our clients to capture this data through online tools and processes that, when analysed, delivers invaluable information at company level. For this reason, we are looking for more contractors and consultants to provide us access to their internal metrics so we can explore this potential for them. Whilst there is a one off bespoking cost and an ongoing monthly fee per user this resultant reports equip them to make more consistent bid/ no bid decisions and inform them where best to focus their investment. 

To discuss this opportunity further please contact

MarketingWorks is a leading business development management consultancy, specialising in work winning in the construction industry. The company provides an array of tools, guidance and mentoring support that helps construction organisations to embed client-centric work-winning behaviours, processes and culture which ensures they win more work.  MarketingWorks has provided services for over 1000 construction firms, including 9 of the top 20 contractors and 5 of the top 10 consultants.

Active Supporters of the Bid Cost Survey 2014

Barbour ABI, Building Magazine, CIOB, Construct UK, Constructing Excellence, Construction News, Designing Buildings WIKI, Glenigan, KMS, RIBA, RICS, Satellite mpr. Simon White, Head of Business Development, Arup; reviewer and contributor to the analysis and interpretation for the 2003 and 2014 Bid Cost Surveys.

No comments:

Post a Comment